ITL #702 Mexico after the World Cup: when the world’s attention becomes a test of trust
IPRA thought leadership essays deliver relevant content for anyone involved in international communications. They provide insight on the live issues that matter in the fast-changing world of Public Relations.
ITL #702 Mexico after the World Cup: when the world’s attention becomes a test of trust
1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Global exposure generated by the World Cup presents an opportunity to build solid and lasting positive perceptions of Mexico. By Amanda Berenstein.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup left packed stadiums, record audiences and unprecedented international exposure for Mexico. But the tournament’s true legacy may lie far from the pitch: in the perception that millions of people formed about the country, and in the strategic opportunity to turn that visibility into lasting trust.
For several months, Mexico was everywhere. It was in sports broadcasts, on social media, in everyday conversations and on the front pages of international media. Millions followed matches, discovered host cities, engaged with content linked to the country and encountered an image of Mexico projected on a global scale. Yet when the final whistle blows and the spotlight moves on to new stories, one question matters more than any scoreboard: what image of the country remains in the minds of those who watched?
The answer matters because, in a world saturated with information, reputation has become one of the most valuable assets any nation holds. It shapes investment decisions, the attraction of talent, tourist arrivals and the capacity to build stronger economic, political and cultural relationships. This is where the World Cup offered some revealing lessons.
According to Mexico as a Nation Brand After the 2026 World Cup, prepared by the Business Intelligence Unit of OPR México, the digital conversation about Mexico grew extraordinarily during the tournament. The analysis of nearly 80,000 posts across digital media, social networks and online platforms in Latin America shows which attributes strengthened the country’s reputation and which still challenge its international positioning. The first finding is telling: the biggest reputational winner of the World Cup was not necessarily football.
The advantage Mexico already had
When people talk about nation brands, there is a tendency to assume that major events create reputation. The reality is usually different. Events generate visibility. Reputation emerges from what audiences find when they turn their attention to a place. In Mexico’s case, the World Cup worked more as an amplifier than as a builder of identity.
The themes that generated the highest levels of affinity were tied to deeply rooted elements of national culture: gastronomy, the richness of its traditions, popular celebrations, music, hospitality, and a way of living together that is easily recognizable even to people who have never visited. This is no minor finding.
In an era when governments, cities and companies compete for attention, Mexico has something no communications campaign can manufacture: a cultural identity capable of generating emotional connection.
People can admire the size of an economy or the modernity of an infrastructure. But affinity arises when there is a story that brings people closer. Few nations have built a cultural narrative as powerful and universal as Mexico’s. Perhaps that is why, when the world turned to look at Mexico, it found something deeper than a tournament. It found an identity.
Beyond tourism
For decades, much of the international narrative about Mexico was tied to tourism. Beaches, gastronomy, cultural heritage and hospitality were the pillars of a successful, if sometimes limited, image. The World Cup helped widen that conversation.
Mentions related to investment, business, infrastructure and economic development recorded some of the most favorable perception levels observed during the period analyzed. Hosting a global event allowed the country to showcase capabilities that usually receive less attention: institutional coordination, infrastructure, logistics and operational capacity.
For many international observers, Mexico appeared not only as an attractive destination, but as a country capable of executing complex projects, mobilizing resources and operating under global standards.
The difference may seem subtle, but it is strategic. The strongest nation brands can project identity and capability at the same time: emotion and trust, culture and development. The World Cup offered exactly that opportunity.
The conversation that persists
No reputation is perfect. Every nation brand coexists with strengths and contradictions, and Mexico is no exception. The OPR México study confirms that, alongside positive conversations about culture, tourism and the economy, one issue continues to shape a large part of international perception: security.
Mentions linked to violence, organized crime and travel alerts concentrated the highest levels of negativity during the period analyzed. More than a surprise, this confirms a tension that has accompanied the country for years. Mexico seems to live between two competing narratives. One speaks of creativity, talent, innovation, cultural richness and economic opportunity. The other points to concerns about security, governance and certainty. The battle for the nation brand is fought precisely in that space: not between positive and negative, but over which narrative manages to define the dominant conversation.
The challenge after the spotlight
There is a fundamental difference between attention and trust. Attention can be won quickly; sometimes a single extraordinary event is enough. Trust works differently. It is built slowly, strengthened through consistency, and depends far less on speeches than on real experiences. That is why the true legacy of the World Cup will not be measured by attendance, economic impact or mentions in international media. It will be measured by Mexico’s ability to use this exposure to build a more solid and lasting perception.
Stadiums empty, digital trends change and the global conversation finds new protagonists. What endures is the impression a country leaves once the spotlight fades. Mexico closes this chapter with assets many nations would envy: a culture admired worldwide, a recognizable identity, a growing perception of economic capability, and a visible demonstration of organization before massive international audiences.
Attention has already been earned. The strategic opportunity now lies in converting that attention into something far more valuable: trust. And that, more than any tournament, is the competition that will define the future of the Mexico brand.
Source: Mexico as a Nation Brand After the 2026 World Cup, prepared by the Business Intelligence Unit of OPR México, based on analysis of approximately 80,000 posts across digital media, social networks and online platforms in Latin America.
The Author
Amanda Berenstein
Amanda Berenstein, President, OPR México.
mail the authorvisit the author's website
Forward, Post, Comment | #IpraITL
We are keen for our IPRA Thought Leadership essays to stimulate debate. With that objective in mind, we encourage readers to participate in and facilitate discussion. Please forward essay links to your industry contacts, post them to blogs, websites and social networking sites and above all give us your feedback via forums such as IPRA’s LinkedIn group. A new ITL essay is published on the IPRA website every week. Prospective ITL essay contributors should send a short synopsis to IPRA head of editorial content Rob Gray emailShare on Twitter Share on Facebook